- HOW TO VIEW XPS ON MAC PRO
- HOW TO VIEW XPS ON MAC PROFESSIONAL
- HOW TO VIEW XPS ON MAC MAC
- HOW TO VIEW XPS ON MAC WINDOWS
The basically shows up to our OpenCL tests with its sleeves rolled up and saying “I heard someone was messing with my little brother here?” And yes, its laptop GPU easily pummels the Mac Pro’s aging desktop GPUs in Geekbench 5’s OpenCL test.
With its Core i9-9980HK and GeForce GTX 1650, can a laptop be faster than a Mac Pro? Well, yes.
HOW TO VIEW XPS ON MAC PRO
We ran OpenCL on both (Metal didn’t work with the dual Fire Pro D500 setup in the Mac anyway) and the results were a good showing for the Mac, with a 104 percent performance advantage over the tiny Dell laptop. Most of our tests have concentrated on CPU chores but we did want to at least poke at the graphics performance, so we also ran Geekbench 5’s Compute module. The Mac Pro is finally faster in one test than the 13.3-inch Dell ultra light laptop.
HOW TO VIEW XPS ON MAC PROFESSIONAL
It takes about five minutes to run and the more CPU cores you have, the faster it typically runs.Īfter several rounds of being pummeled by a tiny laptop, the results here are actually more in line with what expected to see from a 6-core professional grade computer with the Mac Pro scoring 78 percent higher in this particular test. It’s an unbiased photo-realistic renderer which means it doesn’t take any short cuts when rendering an image. Our next CPU test is the Corona Renderer benchmark. Maxon rolled in support for AVX and AVX512 workloads into its newest rendering engine which the 10th gen Ice Lake CPU supports. Whut?Īgain, with both machines with the same Turbo Boost of 3.9GHz, it’s likely not clock speeds here to be blame, but the newer instructions supported by Cinebench R20. IDGĪnd, of course, were again left wondering just what the hell is going on with the Mac Pro as the tiny Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 comes in about 36 percent faster than the Mac in single-threaded performance. Apple actually sells a 12-core version of the Mac Pro still so this result would likely be somewhat applicable to putting the top-end Mac Pro against the XPS 13 2-in-1. We also run Cinebench R20 in its single-threaded mode to try to gauge the speed of each core.
The Mac Pro “wins” but let’s really call this a tie. That’s insane when you again think about how Apple is still selling this “professional-class” workstation, and it’s basically dead even with a 2.8 lbs. Although the Mac Pro is the technical winner here, this is basically a tie. 4-core: no contest right? Yeah think again. Geekbench also tests a single-core mode, which is actually probably closer to most people will see in their day-to-day applications. The thing is, it actually gets uglier-and not for the tiny little laptop either. It’s not a lot, but the fact that the Apple has two more cores should be to its advantage in this test. A quad-core Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 ultrabook is faster than a desktop Mac Pro in Geekbench 5.0. It should and does scale with core count, so no contest right? The latest version of Primate Lab’s Geekbench 5 is a little more intense than previous versions. The Xeon, mind you, has far less thermal restrictions with its 130-watt TDP, and both CPUs actually have the same boost clocks of 3.9GHz. The latest version is more intensive than previous ones and should scale with cores and threads, so a 15-watt TDP quad-core laptop CPU should theoretically have no chance against a 6-core Xeon E5-1650 V2. The first test is Primate Lab’s recently unveiled Geekbench 5.
HOW TO VIEW XPS ON MAC WINDOWS
So how does Apple’s long-abandoned (but still sold) flagship Mac Pro stack up against a thin-and-light modern Windows laptop? Let’s find out-for science! For our tests, we used popular available tests for both Windows and MacOS. And yes, the 2-in-1 is a 360-degree design so it can be used as a tablet. The 1920×1200 resolution touchscreen also supports pen input. The new XPS 13 2-in-1 7390 features a quad-core Intel 10th-gen Core i7-1065G7 with 16GB of LPDDR4X and a 512GB SSD. We wanted to see just how far Intel’s CPUs have progressed, so we ran a few modern benchmarks against both the Mac Pro and a Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 7390 Remove non-product linkthat we’re still reviewing. Gordon Mah UngĬan an ultrabook beat a professional workstation? Yup. All told, our clone probably costs $5,000. We think you’ll agree too since our homebrew, uhh, “Mack” Pro features a 32-core Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX CPU, a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti graphics card, a 2TB Corsair MP600 SSD, and 64GB of RAM in a prototype Dune Pro case.
With its 16GB of RAM and 256GB SSD for $3,000, that’s just not fair at all. Anyway, we only had benchmark numbers for what was once Apple’s mid-range Mac Pro with a 6-core Xeon E5-1650V2 with dual Fire Pro D500 GPUs.
0 kommentar(er)
